Our mission is to collaborate with the community to plan, protect and advance Milton's quality of life.

Friday, March 31, 2017

2017 Planning Forum #2 Meeting Minutes



PLANNING FORUM #2
Meeting Type:               Special Meeting
Date:                            Wednesday, March 29, 2017
Time:                            6:00 p.m.
Place:                            Municipal Building Community Room
Address:                       43 Bombardier Road Milton, VT 05468
Contact:                       (802) 893-1186
Website:                       www.miltonvt.org

DRAFT MEETING MINUTES

1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at approximately 6:05 p.m. 

2. ATTENDANCE
Members Present:  Henry Bonges, Julie Rutz, Tony Micklus, Louis Mossey, Bruce Jenkins, Bob Brisson, Tony Micklus, Bonnie Pease, Judy Kinner.
Members Absent:  Lori Donna, Jessica Groeling, John Lindsay, Ann Bradshaw, Bob Lombard, Jaime Parent, Dan Gaherty, Laurie DiCesare, Nathaniel Carner.
Staff Present:  Jacob Hemmerick, Planning Director; Sarah Macy, Director of Finance & Administration; Kym Duchesneau, Recreation Director; Jeff Castle, Town Planner; Kristen Treanor, Planning Assistant. 
Guest Speakers:  Bob Henneberger & Marie Houghton of AARP; Katelin Brewer-Colie of Local Motion; Brendan Atwood of the Chittenden Area Transportation Management Association (CATMA); Jason Charest of the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission (CCRPC). 
Public Present:  David Armstrong, Joe Duquette, Chuck Spear, John Sharrow, Amy Cook. 
                                                                                                                     
3. AGENDA REVIEW
None. 

4. PUBLIC FORUM
None. 

5. FORUM #2
The theme of Planning Forum #2 was “Transportation:  Principles, Process and Funding.”  The goal was to understand the why, how, and how much of planning and funding transportation projects.  Following is a summary of the presentations the Guest Speakers shared with the group:    
·        AARP:  Henneberger gave an introduction to AARP.  Henneberger and Houghton shared their experience(s) conducting “walk audits” in nearby communities.  The walk audit is a simple but effective tool to determine where deficits in transportation infrastructure exist.  By taking a walk through town, one can learn:  where sidewalks abruptly end or a crosswalk is needed, areas of excessive speeding, or the appropriateness of signage (among many other things).  These observations can shine a light on both big and small problems.  Houghton emphasized that there are small fixes (such as adjusting the timing on a crosswalk) that are easy, inexpensive, and provide immediate results.  Some Q&A followed regarding how AARP got in to the business of Urban Planning, and the importance of planning for senior needs. 
·        Local Motion:  Brewer-Colie presented an overview of Local Motion, a local bike-walk advocacy group that merged with the Vermont Bicycle and Pedestrian Coalition approximately 2 years ago.  Though many locals may know of Local Motion because of the Bike Ferry or Bike Rental programs, they do much more than that.  Brewer-Colie explained some of the other offerings Local Motion has: 
o   Bike Smart:  a school program aimed at teaching children how to safely ride a bike.
o   Everyday Bicycling:  a program aimed at adults wishing to incorporate bicycling into their everyday activities.
o   Family Bike Workshop:  a program aimed at making families comfortable biking together. 
o   Tool Kits:  Local Motion has a set of tool kits available, ranging from their “Get Spotted” program to increase visibility to “Sidewalk Safety Messages” consisting of stencils and materials to create a temporary safety message on a sidewalk. 
o   Pop Up Demonstration Trailer: The organization can also help set road calming demonstration projects to temporarily demonstrate streetscape improvements that make walking and biking safe. 
o   They have also collaborated with the communities of St. Johnsbury and Lyndon to conduct community assessments and walk/bike safety action plans.
Brewer-Colie then spoke of the educational work Local Motion does with community groups such as the Police Department, and their awareness campaigns.  Questions were asked and answered. 
·        CATMA:  Atwood gave an overview of the Chittenden Area Transportation Management Association (formerly the Campus Area Transportation Management Association).  The group started out started serving several hill campuses in Burlington, for example:  the University of Vermont and Fletcher Allen Hospital.  Over the years, the group expanded its offerings to the Chittenden Area.  CATMA works with employers to lessen the costs of commuting and parking, for both their employees and the business.  For example, CATMA can obtain a 28% discount on bus passes, offers a Guaranteed Ride Home program, and has an Employee Transportation Coordinator (ETC) Network.  These programs encourage and support alternative modes of transportation to work (Atwood quoted a 20% reduction in drive-alone trips to work in the group’s early work with hill campuses).  The group utilizes Transportation Data Management (TDM) consisting of four main points: 
o   Data Collection & Analysis
o   Marketing & Education
o   Strategy, Policy & Planning Support
o   Programmatic
Questions/Answers included: 
o   Q:  Do you work only with large employers?  A:  No, CATMA is currently working with an employer of less than 40 employees.   
o   Q:  Are shift workers being considered?  A:  Yes!  CATMA will work with any interested party. 
o   Q:  How much do your services cost?  A:  There is a per-employee fee of $10-20 per year.  CATMA is a non-profit so the cost is very modest. 
·        CCRPC:  Charest shared information on the role the CCRPC plays in getting projects planned and funded.  The CCRPC is the only designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) in the state of Vermont, and as such wields significant influence in transportation planning, as they are responsible for producing a Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP).  The process of getting on to the CCPRC’s Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) was reviewed.  Corridor Studies (which are used to study a wide area and develop a Vision & Goals statement) versus Scoping Studies (which are used to address a specific, detailed problem and develop a Purpose & Need statement) were discussed.  Strauss noted that the takeaway from this presentation should be that the CCRPC helps set up municipalities for success to achieve funding for projects. 

An open discussion followed the presentations.  It was clear that all present want to see things happening “on the ground,” as opposed to just being planned and discussed.  There were several questions about how to fund improvements, which prompted Macy to explain the Tax Increment Financing (TIF) program.  This is one way that the Town hopes to build infrastructure, including the types being talked about at the meeting.  TIF is a complicated process, and Macy stressed the importance of arming one’s self with knowledge, not being afraid to ask questions about TIF, and getting the word out about how the Town can use it to its advantage and make some of these ideas happen within the limited time remaining to issue bonds.  Cook suggested educational outreach at community centers such as the Eagles Club, the Senior Center, etc.   Hemmerick briefly spoke about the role planning development regulations can play in leveraging private investment through the development review process as a way to incrementally build infrastructure. 

Hemmerick closed, noting that the information presented will be useful in considering choices as the Town tackles infrastructure standards and the Town Plan 2018 update.
 
6. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at approximately 8:05 p.m.

Filed with the Town Clerk this _____31st______ day of ___March__________, 2017.